Advertisment
Sunday, June 26, 2022
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TNG Board
  • TNG Investigation
  • Login
TheNewsGuru
  • Home
  • Trending
  • News
    • Nigeria
    • World
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
    • Football
  • Business News
  • Technology
No Result
View All Result
TheNewsGuru
  • Home
  • Trending
  • News
    • Nigeria
    • World
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
    • Football
  • Business News
  • Technology
No Result
View All Result
TheNewsGuru
No Result
View All Result

Home » Nigeria » Nnamdi Kanu: Court strikes out Federal Government’s amended charges

Nnamdi Kanu: Court strikes out Federal Government’s amended charges

Utebor Paul by Utebor Paul
1 month ago
in News, Nigeria
Reading Time: 2 mins read
621 12
A A
0
309
SHARES
1.6k
VIEWS
 

Justice Binta Nyako in a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has struck out the six-count amended treasonable felony charges by the federal government against Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

The charges were struck out after a withdrawal by the Prosecution counsel, Mr. K. E. Kaswe.

Kaswe, who is from the Federal Ministry of Justice, withdrew the charge after Kanu’s team of lawyers led by Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, accused FG of deliberately frustrating the speedy determination of the case.

RecommendedReads

JUST IN: President Buhari to address Nigerians on Sunday to mark 2022 Democracy Day

IPOB: Buhari says Nnamdi Kanu must prove his innocence in court

2 days ago
1.5k
Five die in IPOB, unknown Gunmen clash in Anambra State

Five die in IPOB, unknown Gunmen clash in Anambra State

1 week ago
1.5k

Ozekhome noted that the amended charge was served on him barely 48 hours to the court proceeding.

He maintained that FG introduced fresh issues in the amended charge, including additional documents and proof of evidence that was not originally attached to the case.

“My lord, in one of the attachments, pictures of lawyers waiting to have a meeting with the defendant at the DSS facility, were snapped with secret camera and displayed.

“Names of his lawyers- Ifeanyi Ejiofor and Maxwell Opara- were also mentioned. They have brought new issues and even changed the wordings of the charge. The fact that the court sustained only seven counts in the previous charge and they have now reduced it to six counts, means that the charge has already been altered”, Ozekhome submitted.

He, therefore, said it was wrong for the Prosecution to insist on proceeding with trial, without firstly rearraigning the defendant.

Owing to Ozekhome’s contention, FG’s lawyer, Kaswe, applied to withdraw the amended charge to enable the matter to proceed on trial.

Kaswe told the court that his first witness was available and ready to testify.

Consequently, Justice Nyako struck out the charge.

Meanwhile, the authorities of the Federal High Court in Abuja seem to have soft-pedaled on the stringent conditions imposed on Kanu’s trial.

Against their last month’s decision, the court authorities have stopped the movement of the trial to the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), at Jabi District of Abuja.

Also, the authorities of the Court have permitted the media to witness the trial.

At today’s trial, journalists, lawyers, litigants, as well as workers were allowed into the court premises unhindered after formal introduction and presentation of identity cards.

The court had last month issued a Practice Direction which moved the trial to CCT believed to be large and spacious enough to accommodate the crowd that usually surged to witness the trial.

The Practice direction endorsed by the Chief Judge of the Court, Justice John Tsoho, had also prohibited media coverage except where expressly permitted.

Those stringent conditions seem to have been jettisoned.

Although reasons for deviating from the Practice Direction have not been made known, it was gathered that Jabi Code of Conduct Tribunal was considered too porous for such a sensitive trial, especially from security point of view.

Apart from unhindered access granted to lawyers and media practitioners, roads leading to the court were not blocked unlike what used to be the practice before now, while food vendors also had did their businesses without molestation.

However, adequate security measures were taken to prevent security breaches.

Author

  • Utebor Paul

    View all posts

Tags: IPOBJustice Binta NyakoNnamdi Kanutreasonable felony
SendShare124Tweet77
Previous Post

FEC observes 1 minute silence in honour of ex-minister, Ige

Next Post

Osun Guber: Court affirms Adeleke as PDP authentic candidate

Related Contents

Recruitment: NDLEA releases list of successful candidates
News

Returnee from Brazil arrested with cocaine in private parts

28 mins ago
1.4k
NDLEA reshuffles directors, creates new directorate
News

NDLEA seizes N6bn worth of drugs in Apapa

6 hours ago
1.4k
700,000 Nigerians displaced due to insecurity, banditry-UNHCR
News

700,000 Nigerians displaced due to insecurity, banditry-UNHCR

8 hours ago
1.4k
Load More
Next Post
Osun Guber: Court affirms Adeleke as PDP authentic candidate

Osun Guber: Court affirms Adeleke as PDP authentic candidate

Screening: Police disperse protesters at APC secretariat in Rivers

Screening: Police disperse protesters at APC secretariat in Rivers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Justice Binta Nyako in a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has struck out the six-count amended treasonable felony charges by the federal government against Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). The charges were struck out after a withdrawal by the Prosecution counsel, Mr. K. E. Kaswe. Kaswe, who is from the Federal Ministry of Justice, withdrew the charge after Kanu’s team of lawyers led by Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, accused FG of deliberately frustrating the speedy determination of the case. Ozekhome noted that the amended charge was served on him barely 48 hours to the court proceeding. He maintained that FG introduced fresh issues in the amended charge, including additional documents and proof of evidence that was not originally attached to the case. “My lord, in one of the attachments, pictures of lawyers waiting to have a meeting with the defendant at the DSS facility, were snapped with secret camera and displayed. “Names of his lawyers- Ifeanyi Ejiofor and Maxwell Opara- were also mentioned. They have brought new issues and even changed the wordings of the charge. The fact that the court sustained only seven counts in the previous charge and they have now reduced it to six counts, means that the charge has already been altered”, Ozekhome submitted. He, therefore, said it was wrong for the Prosecution to insist on proceeding with trial, without firstly rearraigning the defendant. Owing to Ozekhome’s contention, FG’s lawyer, Kaswe, applied to withdraw the amended charge to enable the matter to proceed on trial. Kaswe told the court that his first witness was available and ready to testify. Consequently, Justice Nyako struck out the charge. Meanwhile, the authorities of the Federal High Court in Abuja seem to have soft-pedaled on the stringent conditions imposed on Kanu’s trial. Against their last month’s decision, the court authorities have stopped the movement of the trial to the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), at Jabi District of Abuja. Also, the authorities of the Court have permitted the media to witness the trial. At today’s trial, journalists, lawyers, litigants, as well as workers were allowed into the court premises unhindered after formal introduction and presentation of identity cards. The court had last month issued a Practice Direction which moved the trial to CCT believed to be large and spacious enough to accommodate the crowd that usually surged to witness the trial. The Practice direction endorsed by the Chief Judge of the Court, Justice John Tsoho, had also prohibited media coverage except where expressly permitted. Those stringent conditions seem to have been jettisoned. Although reasons for deviating from the Practice Direction have not been made known, it was gathered that Jabi Code of Conduct Tribunal was considered too porous for such a sensitive trial, especially from security point of view. Apart from unhindered access granted to lawyers and media practitioners, roads leading to the court were not blocked unlike what used to be the practice before now, while food vendors also had did their businesses without molestation. However, adequate security measures were taken to prevent security breaches.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home Page
  • Columnist
  • News
    • National
    • World
  • TNG Investigations
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Tech

© 2021 Thenewsguru.com

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
I Accept Cookies
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
I Accept Cookies