EXCITING NEWS: TNG WhatsApp Channel is LIVE…
Subscribe for FREE to get LIVE NEWS UPDATE. Click here to subscribe!
Members of the House of Representatives on Thursday turned down a bill that sought providence of maternity leave for all married male employees in private and public service.
TheNewsGuru reports the Bill for an Act to make provisions for optional paternity leave to Nigerian men by Edward Pwajok (APC, Plateau) failed to scale reading after it was roundly defeated in a voice vote.
The bill was roundly defeated with a unanimous voice vote on the floor, as the lawmakers were of the opinion that since some men are having many wives, it could mean several maternity leaves in a year.
The bill by Pwajok, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), proposes a two or more week (depending on the decision of the House) paternity leave for married men to ensure that mother and child get adequate assistance and care from the father.
The APC lawmaker said the leave became important if the mother or the child has health challenges which will make the presence of the father very significant.
He also said that the presence of the father will afford the child the care he or she deserved during that early period.
“No better person can support a newly born baby than the father which will make the child more emotionally stable if the father stayed close. This will not be peculiar to Nigeria alone, it’s done globally,” he said.
While Saheed Fijabi (APC, Oyo), Nasir Ali (APC, Nassarawa) and Yusuf Tajudeen (PDP, Kogi) supported the proposal saying that it is a joint responsibility of both a mother and a father to take care of a child.
On the other hand, Betty Apiafi (PDP, Rivers) raised a technical challenge against the bill saying since maternity leave issue was discussed in the Labour Act, it would have been better it came as an amendment to the Act and not as a bill.
Uzoma Nkem-Abonta (PDP, Abia), Rita Orji (PDP, Lagos), Nicholas Ossai (PDP, Delta) and Kingsley Chinda (PDP, Rivers) aligned with Apiafi that the ammendment of the Labour Act would be more appropriate.
According to the lawmakers, the men should be out trying to provide for the upkeep of the family rather than staying back at home. They said the leave may have a strain on the family if money is not attached to the leave. They also wondered how many times a man with six or seven wives would go on leave if the bill becomes law.
The motion was roundly defeated in a voice vote.